Experts in the United States agree that it is best to carry a round in the chamber if you carry a pistol for self-defense. Nonetheless, there are plenty of people who opt not to do so for a variety of reasons, and in the case of Israeli military technique, because of historically sound policy.
There are plenty of articles which expound the dangers and demerits of carrying in “Condition Three” as it has come to be known since Col. Jeff Cooper helped develop and promulgate the Modern Pistol Technique. What is not debatable is that both techniques have their strengths and weaknesses, and there is not one “correct” technique for all situations.
In an excellent article, Dr. David Armstrong explains the historical context for empty chamber carry. In reality, empty chamber carry should be considered the universally applicable method of carrying a gun, whereas “Cocked and Locked” is a relatively recent American development.
In this video, I present an example of when empty chamber carry would be appropriate, and offer commentary in response to this author’s opinion. Please enjoy!
Brian Wang is a full time firearms and self-defense instructor who resides in the San Francisco bay area. He is trained under the Massad Ayoob Group to guide civilian students through the complex legal, moral, and social ramifications of the use of Deadly Force in self-defense. Learn more about specialty classes here.
Awsome perspective man i personally carry revolvers and leave the first bullet out incase my son gets it i feel his safety is too priority and if i need to defend myself i can squeeze 2x easily thanks for letting me know im not weird lol
James, have you looked into a quick access pistol safe such as this one? You’ve got the right idea, but it won’t take long for your boy to pull a trigger twice. For a hundred bucks you can be both safer and more effective. Good luck!
Gunvault MV500-STD Microvault Pistol Gun Safe https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000TG9RCC/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_Yi1qxbB8RR8QM